E Reimplantation Femur

Implant Options

 

1.  Long stem cemented revision femoral stem

 

Modern cementing techniques

- removal of neocortex



Advantage

- use in all cases

- good with elderly fragile bone

- can use Abx cement (decreases infection rate)



Indications

- Paprosky Types I – IV

- very versatile

 

Technique

- complete removal / debridement of neocortex

- modern cementing techniques



Howie JBJS Br 2007

- 219 patients, 9 year follow up

- collarless double taper

- 98% 10 year survival



Problems

- ? increased non union with ETO

 

2.  Extensively porous coated diaphyseal fitting uncemented stem



Indications

- Paprosky Types I, II, IIIA



Results

- 90- 95% 10 year survival



Problems

- fracture

- stress shielding with additional proximal bone loss

 

3.  Modular diaphyseal fitting, proximal filling uncemented stem

 

Revision THR Modular Long Stem UncementedModular Revision Implants



Design

- press fit metaphyseal segment

- slotted diaphyseal segment

- initial stability through distal fixation



Indications

- Paprosky Types I – IIIB



Smith J Athroplasty 1997

- nil revisions at 5 years

- 7% radiographically loose

 

Type 3 Revision Femur 2

 

4.  Impaction bone grafting



Concept

- morcellised bone graft is osteoconductive, not osteoinduction

- resorption and eventual replacement new bone

- 6 – 12 months

- process is incomplete

 

Van der Donk Clin Orthop 2002

- 30% complete 6/12

- 90% complete 12/12

 

Requirements

1.  Particulate cancellous autograft 7-10 mm

2.  Contained defect

3.  Ability to convert uncontained into contained (i.e. mesh)



Issues

- technically demanding

- takes time

- need axial and rotational stability

- avoid stem subsidence > 5 mm



Indications

1. Uncemented distal fixation not possible (< 4cm diaphysis)

2. When reconstruction of proximal bone stock important

- young patient in whom biological solution more desirable



Technique



Templating

- choose stem 2 cortical diameters longer than most distal lytic area



Exposure

- full exposure of proximal femur

- removal stem & cement

 

Can leave distal plug

- not infected

- > 2 cm past planned tip location



Create contained defect

- reconstitute femoral tube

- create contained defect

- wire mesh & cerclage wire

- prophylactically cerclage wire shaft if diaphysis flimsy



Distal Occlusion

- threaded intramedullary plug inserted on guide rod

- impacters tested to see max depth of insertion before abutment on canal

- morsellised allograft inserted

- impactor & slap hammer slid over guide wire

- graft impacted to predetermined depth

- continued by introducing more chips with larger impacters

- stopped when level is 10 cm from tip of GT



Proximal Impaction

- appropriate proximal impactor equivalent to selected stem used

- used to force chips against walls of canal

- then larger distal impactor used

- alternated till canal filled

- should be firm neo-canal



Trial Reduction

- trial stem inserted

- depth of insertion marked

- proximal impactor driven in another 5 mm

- creates room for cement



Prosthesis

- cemented polished collarless double tapered stem



Post-op

- NWB for ? 3/52

- then gradual inc over next 3/ 12



Results



Halliday JBJS Br 2003

- 90.5% 10 year survival



Elting Clin Orthop 1995

- 93% graft incorporation

- stem subsidence in 48%



Elridge JBJS Br 1996

- > 5 mm subsidence in 22%

 

Management Plan



Assess Metaphyseal & Diaphyseal Bone Stock



Grade Paprosky, then manage appropriately



Paprosky Type 1

 

Definition



Minimal metaphyseal cancellous bone loss

Intact diaphysis     



Options

 

Simple revision

- can use standard or any revision stems



A. Uncemented

- standard length proximal fit and fill

- need appropriate initial stability



B. Cemented standard length stem

- must remove neocortex

- need good cement interdigitation



Izquierdo JBJS Br 1994

- 90.5% 19 year survival

 

Revision Femur Type 1 Standard Cemented Stem Pre opRevision Femur Type 1 Standard Cemented Stem Post op



C. Cement onto old mantle

- clean and dry mantle critical

- thin layer of blood 85% reduction shear strength



Lieberman et al JBJS Br 1993

- 19 cases

- no loosening at 5 years in all

 

Revision Femur Paprosky 1 Revision Femur Paprosky 1 Cement in old Cement Mantle

 

Type 2

 

Definition



Extensive metaphyseal cancellous bone loss

Diaphysis intact



Options

 

A.  Extensively porous coated diaphyseal fitting implant



Paprosky 90& osteointegrated

 

Calcar Replacement Uncemented Stem



B.  Long stem cemented revision stem

 

Revision Femur Long Stem Cemented Femoral Component



C.  Modular diaphyseal fitting, metaphyseal filling uncemented prosthesis



D.  Impaction bone grafting

 

Type 3A

 

Definition



Metaphysis non supportive

> 4 cm diaphysis proximal to isthmus

 

Type 3 A FemurType 3A Femur Lateral



A.  Extensively porous coated diaphyseal fitting implant

 

Type 3 Revision Femur



Paprosky 20/22 91% osseointegrated



B.  Long stem cemented revision stem

 

Revision Femur Long stem Cemented Component



C.  Modular uncemented

 

D.  Impaction bone grafting

 

Revision Femur Type IIIA Pre Impaction Bone GraftingRevision Femur Type IIIA Post Mesh and Impaction Bone Grafting

 

Type 3B

 

Definition



Metaphysis non supportive

< 4cm diaphysis proximal to isthmus

 

Options



A.  Extensively coated diaphyseal fitting



Paprosky 4/8 failed

- i.e. need > 4cm of diaphysis for this to work



B.  Long stem cemented revision stem



C.  Modular uncemented, stem with flutes for rotational stability



D.  Impaction bone grafting

 

Revision Femur Type 3 Mesh and Impaction Bone Grafting

 

Type 4

 

Definition



Metaphysis and diaphysis extensively damaged

Isthmus non supportive

 

Options



A.  Long stem cemented revision stem



B.  Impaction bone grafting

 

Management Bone Defects

 

1.  Segmental defects



A.  Must bypass any cortical defect by two cortical diameters to reduce fracture risk



B.  Cortical Strut onlay grafts

 

2.  Extensive proximal bone loss

 

A.  Calcar replacing

 

Calcar Replacing THRCalcar Replacing Hip Replacement



Indications

- proximal segmental defect < 3cm



McLaughlin JBJS Am 1996

- 38 hips 11 years

- 80% survival

- another 10% radiologically loose

- 20% dislocation rate

 

B.  Napkin ring  / Calcar graft Allograft



Indications

- circumferential proximal defects < 3cm



Results

- poor

- 40-60% resorption

 

C.  Proximal Femoral Replacement / Tumour prosthesis



Results disappointing

- however design may be improving



Malkani JBJS Br 1995

- 33 hips 11 years

- poor function (50% severe limp or unable to walk)

- 64% 12 years survival

- 22% dislocation

 

D.  Bulk Structural Proximal Femoral Allograft



Indications

- proximal defect > 3 cm



Technique

- desired stem cemented into allograft

- press fit distally into host femur

- step cut graft host junction

- secure cerclage wire and onlay cortical strut

- proximal host bone wrapped around allograft with ABD preservation

- very important – abductor mechanism must be secured and protected



Gross 1998

- 200 patients, 5 years follow up

- 12.5% revision

- revised for infection, dislocation, graft-host non union