Management

 

scfeSCFEscro

 

Management

 

Aims

 

1.  Prevent further slip by fusing physis -  30% SCFE will worsen untreated

 

2.  Prevent deformity and osteoarthritis

 

3.  Avoid complications 

 

Issue

 

Residual deformity from moderate and severe hips causes FAI and osteoarthritis

 

Reduction maneuvers increase risk of AVN

 

Options

 

Percutaneous insitu screw fixation

Closed reduction + Percutaneous insitu screw fixation

Open reduction / Parsch technique

Subcapital osteotomy (SCRO)

 

Percutaneous insitu screw fixation

 

Indication

 

Mild to moderate slip

 

Set up

 

1.  Supine on radiolucent table

- much faster if pinning both sides / reduced set up

- theoretical risk of displacing slip / inadvertant manipulation

- lateral by flexing and full ER of hip / frog legs

 

2.  Traction Table

- easy to get AP and lateral

- need 2 set ups for bilateral pinning

 

Technique

 

SCFESCFESCFE

 

POSNA insitu pinning technique fracture table PDF

 

Vumedi insitu pinning technique supine on radiolucent table video

 

Draw anterior and lateral lines

- intersection of points is incision site

- stab incision

 

AP view

- centered on femoral neck

- aiming towards center of femoral epiphysis

- more severe slips require more proximal starting points

- aim posterior to SCFE

- avoid starting below lesser trochanter to avoid fracture

 

Frog leg lateral 

- center of femoral epiphysis

 

Ensure that wire and screw don't penetrate head

- do far and away screening

- see approach / withdraw

- insert fully threaded 6.5 mm / 7.3 mm screw 

 

scfeSCFE

 

Postoperative

 

? CT to ensure no intra-articular screw

Touch weight bear six weeks

Serial xray to ensure no loss of position / physeal fusion

 

Results

 

Schlenzka et al, Bone Joint J. 2023

- retrospective review of 172 hips post insitu fixation

- 41% of hips end in THA at 50 year follow up

 

Closed Reduction 

 

SCFESCFE

 

Indications

 

Severely displaced acute unstable slip

- difficult to pin in situ

- will result in severe functional impairment 

 

Issue

 

? increased risk of AVN

 

Results

 

Napora et al Orthopedics 2021

 - 48 unstable SCFE treated with closed reduction and screw fixation

- 26% developed AVN

 

Open reduction + Percutaneous In Situ Pinning

 

Parsch technique

- anterior approach

- capsulotomy to decompress hematoma

- controlled reduction of slip

 

Results

 

Kaushal et al J Pediatr Orthop 2019

- systematic review of capsulotomy in 450 unstable SCFE 

- capsulotomy: AVN 17%

- no capsular decompresion: AVN 27%

 

Subcapital Realignment Osteotomy (SCRO) / Modified Dunn Procedure

 

SCROscro

 

Concept

 

Open surgical dislocation of hip

Preserve vessels to femoral epiphysis 

Reduce epiphysis onto metaphysis

 

Indication

 

Moderate and severe slips

- both acute and chronic

- high risk of FAI and subsequent osteoarthritis

 

Technique

 

scroscroscro

 

JBJS Essential surgical techniques PDF

 

Vumedi modified Dunn procedure video

 

Lateral approach

- trochanteric osteotomy

- Z shaped capsulotomy

- maintain posterior retinacular and medial circumflex vessels

- surgical hip dislocation / release ligamentum teres

- elevate periosteal flap / retinaculum from the femoral neck

- mobilize epiphysis carefully

- remove posterior callus

- open and debride physis

- reduce femoral epiphysis and stabilize

- ORIF greater trochanter osteotomy

 

Results

 

Abdelnasser et al BMC Musculoskeletal Disorder 2025

- systematic review of 500 modified Dunn procedures

- AVN 10%

 

Ziebarth et al CORR 2024

- 54 patients with unstable moderate and severe slips treated with modified Dunn procedure

- AVN 7%

 

Novais et al CORR 2015

- compared 30 severe SCFE

- half pin in situ, half modified Dunn procedure

- modified Dunn: 9/15 good or excellent outcome

- pin in situ: 4/15 good or excellent outcome

 

SCROAVN

 

Prophylactic pinning of contralateral hip

 

Bilateral screws

 

Incidence contralateral hip

 

Yildirim et al JBJS Am 2008

- 227 unilateral SCFE

- 36% developed contralateral slip 

- 1/5 were moderate to severe slips

 

Risk factors

 

Swarup et al J Paediatr Orthop 2020

- systematic review of risk factors for contralateral SCFE

- younger patient age

- body mass index ≥95th percentile

- endocrine abnormality,

- higher posterior slope angle (> 15 degrees)  of the unaffected hip

 

Indications

 

High risk for contralateral slip

- young patient - increased time for a contralateral slip to occus

- high BMI / endocrine issues

- geographical isolation / unreliable parents

- high posterior slope angle > 15 degrees

 

Issue

 

Complications such as chondrolysis / AVN  / subtrochanteric fracture

 

Sankar et al CORR 2013

- 99 patients with prophylactic pinning contralateral hip

- chondrolysis 0%

-  AVN 2%

- periimplant femur fractures 2%

- symptomatic hardware 3%