Chondrosarcoma

 

Chondrosarcoma Proximal Femur Xray0001Chondrosarcoma Proximal Femur Xray0002

 

Definition 

 

Malignant cartilage producing tumour

 

Epidemiology

 

Second most common primary malignant bone tumor after osteosarcoma

- 20 - 27%

 

Mean age 50 - 70% of patients > 40 at age of presentation

Male = Females

 

Location

 

Extremities 45%

- medullary canal metaphysis long bones

- proximal femur

 

Axial skeleton 31%

- 20% pelvis

 

Two Distinct Types

 

1.  Primary Chondrosarcoma

 

Arises de novo

 

2.  Secondary Chondrosarcoma (1/4)

 

Arises in existing cartilage lesion

- most common in osteochondromas / enchondromas

- also fibrous dysplasia / unicameral bone cyst / Paget's / post radiotherapy

 

Osteochondroma

 

< 1% solitary lesions

5% multiple lesions

 

Malignant features

- growth after skeletal maturity

- pain

- calcification in cartilage cap

- disappearance of previous calcification

- cartilage cap > 1-3 cm

- hot on bone scan

- erasure of smooth outline

 

Chondrosarcoma from OsteochondromaChondrosarcoma

 

CS humerus 1CS humerus 2

 

Enchondroma 

 

Malignant features

- endosteal scalloping

- size > 5 cm rarely benign (80% of enchondromas are < 2cm)

 

Chondrosarcoma Proximal Femur Xray0001Chondrosarcoma Proximal Femur Xray0002

 

Grading

 

Conventional Chondrosarcoma

 

Grade 1  Low

Grade 2  Intermediate

Grade 3  High grade

 

Non conventional subtypes (10 - 15%)

 

Periosteal / clear cell / myxoid / mesenchymal / dedifferentiated

 

Clinical

 

Pain

- progressive

- at night

 

X-ray

 

Lytic lesion with punctate or spotty calcification

 

Worrisome features

- growth over time

- large > 5cm 

- endosteal scalloping is hallmark of chondrosarcoma

 

CS hip 1CS Hip 2

Enchondroma enlarging over time

 

CS shoulder 1CS shoulder 2

Large calcification with endosteal scalloping humerus

 

Hip chondrosarcoma xray

Large calcified lesion with endosteal scalloping

 

Pathological fractures CS

Pathological fracture

 

MRI

 

Douis et al Eur Radiol 2014

- MRI of 179 chondrosaroma

- features of high grade chondrosarcoma

- bone expansion, active periostitis, soft tissue mass and increased tumour length

 

CS Hip 2CS mRI hip 1CS hip mri 2

 

Chondrosarcoma from OsteochondromaCS knee MRI 1CS knee MRI 2

 

CS humerus 2CS humerus MRI 1CS humerus MRI 2

 

CT

 

Hip CS path fracture 1Hip Fracture CS CT

 

Histology

 

Lobules of hyaline cartilage

 

Features that suggest malignancy

- pleomorphism / hypercellularity / mitotic figures / double nuclei

 

Pathology outlines / chondrosarcoma

 

Biopsy

 

Accuracy

 

Roitman et al CORR 2017

- accuracy of histological grading of biopsy versus samples from surgery

- 126 chondrosarcoma

- grouped into high versus low grade

- accuracy 90% in long bones

- accuracy 67% in pelvis

 

Tsuda et al CORR 2019

- accuracy of histological grading of biopsy versus samples from surgery

- 262 pelvic chondrosarcoma

- accuracy of biopsy in defining grade 37%

 

Reliability of histological grading

 

SLICED study group, JBJS Am 2007

- 9 pathologists viewing 46 biopsies / samples

- benign / low grade / high grade

- inter-rater reliability 0.4

 

Management

 

Principles

 

Resistant to chemotherapy / radiotherapy

- slow growing

- low vascularity

 

High grade

- wide resection

 

Low grade

- slow growing / low risk of of metastasis

- ? suitable for intra-lesional treatment

 

Dedifferentiated

- consider chemotherapy

 

Low grade / intralesional treatment

 

Technique

 

Cortical window

- burr / currette

- phenol / cryotherapy / liquid nitrogen

 

Results

 

Dierselhuis et al Cochrane Database Sys Review 2019

- intralesional treatment versus wide resection for low grade / Grade 1 chondrosarcoma long bones

- 14 studies and 511 participants

- 419 treated with intralesional treatment, 91 with wide resection

- no difference in recurrence free survival

- lower complication rates and better functional outcomes with intralesional treatment

 

High grade / Wide resection

 

CS Hip 2CS hip megaprosthesis

 

CS shoulder 1CS shoulder megap

 

CS humerus 1CS Humerus surgery 1CS Humerus surgery 2

 

 

Chondrosarcoma from OsteochondromaChondrosarcoma Surgery 2Chondrosarcoma Resection

 

Pelvis

 

Issues

- low grade uncommon

- wide resection difficult

 

Pelvic CS xrayPelvic CS CTPelvic CS MRI

 

Wide resection

- hemipelvectomy

- hind quarter amputation (1% mortality)

 

Pelvic CS postop

 

Prognosis

 

Grade 1: >90% 5 year survival

Secondary chondrosarcoma: 90% 5 year survival

Grade 2: 75% 5 year survival

Grade 3: 30% 5 year survival

 

Factors

 

Histological grading

 

Surgical margins

- important as there is no adjuvant treatment

- more difficult in the pelvis

 

Histological grading

 

Fromm et al World J Surg Oncol 2019

- 37 patients with grade 1 chondrosarcoma

- 5 year survival 97%

- 10 year survival 92%

 

Dierselhuis et al Cochrane Database Sys Review 2019

- intermediate grade 10 year survival 53 to 64%

- high grade 10 year survival 29 to 38%

 

Amer et al J Orthop Research 2020

- Juxtacortical:  68% 5 year survival

- Clear-cell: 62% 5 year survival

- Myxoid: 50% 5 year survival

- Mesenchymal: 38% 5 year survival

- Dedifferentiated: 11% 5 year survival

 

Tsuda et al Bone Joint J 2019

- Chondrosarcoma secondary to osteochondroma

- 51 cases treated with wide resection

- 10 year survival 89%

- increased recurrence in pelvic tumours

 

Surgical margins

 

Tsuda et al CORR 2019

- 262 pelvic chondrosarcoma

- patients with > 1 mm resection 100% 10 year disease free survival

- patients with < 1 mm resection 52% 10 year disease free survival

 

Stevenson et al Eur J Surg Oncol 2018

- 341 cases chondrosarcoma

- surgical margin > 0.4 mm important at reducing local recurrence

- local recurrence associated with reduced survival in grade 2 and 3