Management

 

epiphysiodesis8 platesLLDLLD

 

Treatment guidelines by projected LLD

 

Options

 

Orthotics

Physeal bar resection - removal of central physeal bar

Ephysiodesis - slow or stop growth in long leg

Leg lengthening

 

0 - 2 cm 2 - 5cm 6 - 15 cm > 15 cm
Heel raise

Heel raise + sole raise

 

Epiphysiodesis contralateral

Lengthening ipsilateral

 

Epiphysiodesis contralateral

 

Guided growth

Amputation

 

Orthotics

 

Options

 

Heel raisesole raise

 

Heel raise

- simple insert placed inside shoe

- max 2 cm

 

Sole raise / shoe lift

- custom made external orthotic / thicken heel

- max 5 cm

 

5 - 12 cm

- subtalar joint unstable

- requires steel bar reinforcement

 

Physeal bar resection

 

Definition

 

Removal of partial growth plate arrest to restore normal growth

- central bars: cause LLD

- peripheral bars: angular deformity

 

Indication

 

< 50% growth plate bar

> 2 years growth

 

LLDLLDLLD

 

Technique

 

Arthroscopic assist technique PDF

 

Approach

- peripheral bar - direct approach

- central bar - metaphyseal window

- excision of bar with burr preserving normal physis

- fat graft interposition

 

EpiphysiolysisEpiphysiolysis

 

Results

 

Marsh et al J Pediatr Orthop 2006

- 32 cases of central physeal bar 

- excised with arthroscopic assistance

- adequate longitudinal growth in 70%

 

Epiphysiodesis

 

Definition

 

Slow or stop growth in long leg to match short leg

 

Indication

 

LLD 2 - 5 cm

 

Options

 

Permanent epiphysiodesis

- remove growth plate to permanently stop growth

- need to carefully calculate final LLD

- need to be close to skeletally mature

 

Temporary epiphysiodesis

- Guided growth - temporary growth plate arrest using 8 plates

- can perform at younger age

- can repeat if needed

 

Permanent epiphysiodesis

 

Options

 

Phimester technique - open bone block excision, flip, reinsert bone block

Percutaneous technique - minimally invasive drilling / curette under fluoroscopy

 

Technique

 

Estimate LLD at maturity

- Green and Anderson chart

- Moseley straight line graph

- Paley multiplier method

www.boneschool.com/pediatrics/LLD-background

 

Determine timing of epiphysiodesis

- LLD at skeletal maturity

- girls stop growing at 14 / boys stop growing at 16

- distal femur 9 mm / year
- proximal femur 3 mm / year
- proximal tibia 6 mm / year
- distal tibia 3 mm / year

 

Permanent epiphysiodesis

- fluoroscopy

- medial and lateral approaches

- drill / currette growth plate

 

epiphysiodesisepiphysiodesisepiphysiodesisepiphysiodesis

 

Results

 

Tirta et al J Pediatr Orthop B 2024

- systematic review of Phemister technique versus percutaneous eiphysiodesis

- 3000 cases

- overall success rate 74%

- severe complications: Phemister 10%, percutaneous epiphysiodesis 5%

 

Temporary epiphysiodesis 

 

Concept

 

Temporary cessation of growth in long leg

- reduced need to calculate LLD at skeletal maturity

- remove after 2 years to prevent permanent growth plate arrest

- can repeat

 

Options

 

8 plates / tension band plates

Percutaneous transphyseal screws

Blounts staples

 

Transphyseal screws8 plates

 

Results

 

Screws versus plates versus staples

 

Tirta et al Acta Orthop 2024

- systematic review of staples v screws v tension band plates for LLD

- 44 studies and 2000 patients

- screws: success rate 76%, severe complications 7%, angular deformity 4%

- tension band plates: success rate 67%, severe complications 17%, angular deformity 10%

- staples: success rate 51%, severe complications 16%, angular deformity 17%

 

Cheng et al J Child Orthop 2021

- 53 patients with LLD treated with temporary epiphysiodesis

- percutaneous transphyseal screws versus 8 plates

- increased angular deformity with 8 plates

 

Angular deformity - sagittal / coronal plane

 

Furuhashi et al J Orthop Sci 2020

- 27 patients mean age 10 with LLD 

- temporary epiphysiodesis of distal femur

- anterior placement of implants associated with extension deformity

- implants need to be in center of growth plate

 

Alteration proximal tibial morphology

 

Starobrat et al J Clin Med 2024

- 60 patients with LLD treated with temporary epiphysiodesis

- compared 18 months v 30 months v 44 months of treatment

- treatment of > 40 months affected shape of proximal tibia

 

Rebound growth acceleration

 

Technique 8 plates

 

Orthofix Eight plate surgical technique PDF

 

Medial and lateral approaches

- Eight plates centered on growth plate with K wire into physis

- screws above and below physis

- screws parallel or divergent

- femur +/- tibia +/- both

 

8 plates

 

Leg Lengthening

 

LLDLLDLLD

 

Distraction osteogenesis

 

1. Osteotomy - low energy corticotomy, preserve periosteum

2. Latency period - allow callous to form, 1 week

3. Distraction period callotasis - incremental callous distraction after latency period, 1 mm a day

4. Consolidation period - 1 month per cm

 

Indication Advantage Disadvantage

LLD 5 - 15 cm

 

5 cm femur / 5 cm tibia

 

Any more risks nerve injury

Maintains height

Steep learning curve

 

Long process

 

High complication rate

 

Options

External fixation

- monolateral femur / circular frame tibia

- external fixator + flexible intramedullary nail

- plate assisted - lengthen with external fixator, then apply plate

 

Self lengthening nail - growth plates fused

 

Corticotomy
 

Drill-holes & closed osteoclasis / Di Bastiani

- percutaneous skin incision

- multiple drill holes first to weaken bone

- osteotome to complete

- apply force to complete fracture

 

Tibia

- incision lateral crest tibia, elevate periosteum lateral tibia

- incision medial border tibia, elevate periosteum medial tibia

- pass artery clip between periosteum and bone to pass gigli saw

 

External fixation 

 

Monolateral external distractor femur

 

Monolateral external fixator

Smith and Nephew Modular Rail External fixator

 

Circular external fixation / Ilizarov / Taylor spatial frame

 

Horn et al Acta Orthop 2017

- 213 LLD correction with Taylor spatial frame

- mean age 14

- mean lengthening 4 cm

 

IlizarovIlizarov

Smith & Nephew Ilizarov External Fixation

 

TSFTSF

Smith & Nephew Taylor Spatial Frame

 

External fixation over flexible nails

 

External fixation

From: Popkov et al J Child Orthop 2016 technique PDF

 

Popkov et al J Pediatr Orthop 2021

- 70 lengthenings with external fixation over nail

- mean age 13

- 19 femoral, 51 tibial

- 4 cases of fracture at lengthening site

 

Self lengthening nails

 

LLDLLDLLD

 

Concept

 

Extenally controlled, motorized, magnet driven

 

Results

 

Iliadis et al J Pediatr Orthop 2021

- 50 leg lengthening (43 femoral / 7 tibial) using IMN

- mean age 15

- mean lengthening 4.7 cm

- nail accuracy 96%

- no significant complications

 

Frost et al Acta Orthop 2023

- 314 leg lengthening with FITBONE and PRECICE nails

- 80% in femur

- 53% complications

- device: distraction mechanism - runaway nails, locked nails

- joint: contracture

- bone: premature consolidation, delayed union, deformity, fracture



 

 

Precice femoral nail

PRECICE intra-medullary leg lengthening system 

 

 

Fitbone femoral nailFitbone

FITBONE femoral lengthening system PDF

 

Fitbone tibiaFitbone tibia

FITBONE tibial lengthening system PDF